Legal Opinion
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports
Decided August 23, 2004Published
1Opinion of the Court
The Honorable Lindbergh Thomas State Representative Post Office Box 505 Grady, AR 71644-0505
Dear Representative Thomas:
I am writing in response to your request for my opinion on the following questions:
1. Pursuant to provisions of A.C.A. 6-13-1405(a)(5), as amended by Act 60 of the 2003 (2d Ex. Sess.), is the former Dumas School District considered an "affected district," and, if not, does Arkansas law require that the interim board of the new consolidated school district be made up entirely of board members from the board of directors of the former Gould School District?
2. Assuming that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Lawhon Farm Services v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Donoho v. DonohoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Citizens to Establish a Reform Party v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- City of Fort Smith v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.