Legal Opinion
Grim v. Cheatwood
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 21, 1953No. 35178PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHalley, C. J.
Plaintiffs in their amended petition allege that on and prior to August 14, 1945, the plaintiffs were cotenants and joint owners equally in an undivided one-half interest in all of the mineral rights in and under a tract of land referred to as tract No. 1, located in the NW/4 of section 32, township 13 north, range 23 west, in Roger Mills county, Oklahoma; that plaintiff Orval Grim was the individual owner of mineral rights in a certain tract of land referred to as tract No. 2, located and situated in the NW/4 of section 23, township 15 north, range 21 west, in Roger Mills county, Oklahoma.
Tha…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hobbs v. BoatrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Stewart v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Webb v. . FulchireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
- Coleman v. ColemanArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Falkenberg v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jack K. Berman v. Riverside Casino Corporation, H. J. Munley, Emmet Munley, William Miller, First Doe and Second DoeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
- Grim v. CheatwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Rose v. National Auction GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Rose v. National Auction GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 2002