Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Coleman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1936No. Civil No. 3747PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

C. P. Coleman, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Omphie B. Coleman and Mary E. Coleman, his wife, hereinafter called defendants, asking that a certain deed executed by plaintiff in favor of defendants be canceled; that it be adjudged that the property described in the deed is held in trust by defendants for plaintiff; and that the possession thereof be restored to plaintiff; and defendants be required to account for the moneys received as rentals from the property.

Defendants answered alleging: (a) That the property so conveyed to them was, as a matter of fact, originally held…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MacRae v. MacRaeArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Gorrell v. AlspaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Inhabitants of School-District No. Four v. BensonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1850
  4. Cunningham v. CunninghamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Stewart v. McLaughlin's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dawson v. McNaneyArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Barnette v. McNultyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  3. Owens v. M.E. Schepp Ltd. PartnershipArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Bishop v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  5. Spector v. AhrenholzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API