Legal Opinion
Stander v. Orentreich
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stanley L. Sklar, J.
The essential question raised by the present motion and cross motion in this action for medical malpractice and related claims is whether plaintiffs’ causes of action are barred by the Statute of Limitations.
Plaintiff Bella Stander and her husband plaintiff Robert Mason move to dismiss the first affirmative defense of defendant dermatologist, Norman Orentreich, M.D.,* which raises the Statute of Limitations defense. Based on this defense and on plaintiffs’ alleged failure to state a cause of action with respect to plaintiffs’ fourth cause of action,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Maddox v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- McDermott v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clancy v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Dockery v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Weissman v. Dow Corning Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995