Legal Opinion
Covey v. Surgidev Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 16, 1993No. 5:92 CV 1136PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAM H. BELL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The above-captioned matter was commenced with the filing of a complaint on the 9th of June, 1992. This court’s subject matter jurisdiction is premised upon the diverse citizenship of the parties. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges that the defendant is a corporation which designs, manufactures and sells intraocular lenses, which are implanted into the eye. Plaintiff alleges that on the 24th of September, 1984, the plaintiff, under the care of one Doctor Bunin, had an anterior chamber intraocular lens, Model 10 (Leiske lens) implanted into his…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- No. 93-5555Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Kemp v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Lamontagne v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Bravman v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Connelly v. Iolab Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.