Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Sappington
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
Parties hereto appearing in this court in the same relative positions as in the trial court, will be designated as plaintiff and defendant accordingly.
Plaintiff brought its action in the district court of Jefferson county against defendant as county treasurer, and prayed a refund of a certain portion of taxes paid under protest, for one-half the fiscal year 1924-1925.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendant in causes of action numbered 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12, and as these causes of action are identical, except the names of the townships and the amount of refund…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mayor v. HartridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
- United States v. WigglesworthU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1842
- Lusk v. Starkey, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Dickinson v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Lusk v. Eminhiser, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Campbell v. CornishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Albrecht v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930