Legal Opinion
St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Morris
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 10, 1930No. 19914PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The plaintiff in error presents 13 contentions on this appeal. The 1st, 2nd, 11th, 12th, and 13th are formal and need not -be here set forth. The others are as follows:
“3. The court erred in its findings of fact and conclusions of law in determining and assessing the amount of recovery of plaintiff in error on count 1 of the 11th cause of action, in that the true amount of recovery should have been $95.79 on said count, to which findings of fact and conclusions of law the plaintiff in error, at the time, excepted.
“4. The court erred in its findings of fact and conclusions of law, in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Albrecht v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. SappingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Protest of Texas Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930