Hummel v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s orders striking her amendment by interline-ation and granting the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant, Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD). We affirm.
Plaintiff filed a petition alleging she was injured when she fell into a hole in the ground caused by MSD’s defectively maintained underground sewer lines. 1 Specifically, she alleged,
2. That Defendant ... was the owner of certain sewer pipes and equipment which were buried beneath the surface of the real estate owned by Francis Rogers and Audrey Rogers (Hereinafter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kanagawa v. State by and Through FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Edwards v. HeidelbaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Twente v. Ellis Fischel State Cancer HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Mercantile Trust Co. National Ass'n v. MosbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by10 opinions
- Oldaker v. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Mattes v. Black & VeatchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Fox v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Preston v. PrestonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Miller v. GuzeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.