Legal Opinion

Mattes v. Black & Veatch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1992No. WD 43405PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ULRICH, Judge.

Dr. John Mattes and wife, Marcia, appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Black & Veatch. 1 Appellants contend the trial court erred because genuine issues of material fact exist and because respondent’s affidavits were insufficient to support summary judgment. The summary judgment is affirmed.

Mrs. Mattes alleges she was injured while working for Mobay Chemical Corporation (“Mobay”) at its Jackson County disposal treatment facility. Mrs. Mattes sued Black & Veatch and other defendants for personal injuries she sustained at Mobay’s facility, and Dr. Mattes sued…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Magee v. Blue Ridge Professional Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Cure v. City of JeffersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. Emich Motors Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. Unlimited Equipment Lines, Inc. v. Graphic Arts Centre, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Thoroughbred Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Nettie's Flower Garden, Inc. v. Sis, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Stewart v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API