Legal Opinion
Heide v. Panoulias
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 12, 1911No. 250PublishedCited by 7 opinions
lu Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action at law by Panayiotis Panoulias against Henry Heide. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
EACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The patent is No. 663,359, issued December 4, 1900, to plaintiff for “dipping-frame for coating candies.” The specification states that:
“Tliis invention relates to dipping-frames for coating candies and more particularly chocolates; and the object thereof is to provide an improved dipping-frame of lilis class in which the candies or cores thereof are immersed in liquid chocolate or other material and are thus coated. A particular object of the present invention is to provide a dipping-frame of the class described with devices whereby the coated candies are marked to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Heald v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Bischoff v. WetheredSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Tucker v. SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reis v. RosenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. McAuleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Transit Development Co. v. Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Automatic Pencil Sharpener Co. v. Boston Pencil Pointer Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
- Innersprings, Inc. v. Joseph Aronauer, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.