Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Carter & Potruch
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1956No. Civ. 21393PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendants entered on an order sustaining their demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend. The demurrer was sustained on the ground the action is barred by the statute of limitations.
The second amended complaint alleges: At all times mentioned defendants were attorneys at law in partnership. On May 1, 1952, plaintiff entered into a written agreement with Boulevard Motors, Inc., whereby plaintiff sold to Boulevard the personal property and good will of a wrecking yard for $5,000, payable $3,000 at close of escrow and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Law v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Tumansky v. WoodruffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- Amen v. Merced County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Summit Financial Holdings, Ltd. v. Continental Lawyers Title Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Peterson Development Co. v. Torrey Pines BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Borgonovo v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Builders' Control Service of Northern California Inc. v. North American Title Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.