Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Carothers

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1945No. 11293PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE, Circuit Judge.

The Price Administrator brought this suit to enjoin the defendants from violating the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 56 Stat. 23, as amended by the Stabilization Extension Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 632-640, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix. § 901 et seq.

The facts are undisputed: Defendants as co-partners operated one automobile parking lot in Dallas, Texas, and defendant D. M. Carothers individually operated eighteen such lots in Houston, Texas. Under their method of operation, referred to as the “park and lock” plan, the customer drives his car upon the lot, parks and locks it, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carothers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  2. Cochran v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1947
  3. Porter v. Eastern Sugar AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  4. Porter v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  5. Wasservogel v. BeckerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API