Legal Opinion

Allison v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 2, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.

The plaintiff Allison testified that although it was somewhat foggy on the morning of the accident he could see two or three hundred feet; that neither he nor the decedent was familiar with the road from Plymouth to Woodsville; that he was not aware of the existence of Spaulding’s Crossing until an instant before the impact when he saw a “black flash” which was the boiler of the locomotive; and that he heard no locomotive whistle or bell just prior to the collision. The foregoing testimony, and the plaintiff introduced no other, as to the events leading up to the accident, is insufficient to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collette v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  2. McGill v. Maine & New Hampshire Granite Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
  3. Bennett v. Odell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seybold v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Martin v. Wentworth-Douglass HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. Jackson v. SmartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  4. Austin v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  5. Seybold v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API