Legal Opinion

Austin v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 1, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.

The defendant’s exceptions to the denial of its motions that the verdicts be set aside have been neither briefed nor argued and are understood to have been waived. The only issues before us, therefore, are those raised by the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of its motions for nonsuits and directed verdicts.

Three claims of negligence are made by each plaintiff and these claims are alike in each case. They are that the defendant failed to give due warning by whistle and bell of the approach of the train, that it failed to maintain an adequate lookout for travelers upon the highway and that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Collins v. HustisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
  2. Jones v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  3. Stocker v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  4. Cyr v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  5. Feuerstein v. GradySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Creasy v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API