Legal Opinion

David v. Municipality No. Two

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1859PublishedCited by 8 opinions

from the Second District Oonrt of New Orleans, Lea, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

This case is identical in principle with those of Livaudais v. Municipality No. Two, 16 La. 509 ; Livaudais & David v. same, 5 An. 8 ; Municipality No. Two v. Palfrey, 7 An.; A. Xiques et al v. Bujac et al., 7 An.

For the reasons assigned by the Judge of the lower court, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment appealed from be affirmed, with costs in both courts.

Opinion of the Disteict Judge.

In this case, both parties trace their alleged title to a common source. The plaintiffs and intervenors claim to be declared the owners, and as such to be put in possession of a portion of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Livaudais v. Municipallity Number TwoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co. v. Parker Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Jaenke v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Di Franco v. AscaniLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Stringfellow v. Nowlin Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API