Legal Opinion

City of Roswell v. Chavez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1989No. 11,174PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Judge.

The Subsequent Injury Fund (the fund) filed an application for interlocutory appeal from the hearing officer’s decision granting summary judgment to employer (the city) and denying the fund’s own motion for summary judgment. The fund claimed below that the statute of limitations had run. The city, on the other hand, argued the statute had not commenced running until the certificate of preexisting impairment was signed by the worker or, if the statute had begun to run earlier, that it was tolled during the period of time worker refused to sign the certificate. The hearing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Hardin v. FarrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. ABF Freight System v. MontanoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Pena v. New Mexico Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Molinar v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ocana v. American Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Brunacini v. KavanaghNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Aragon v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Jojola v. Aetna Life & CasualtyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Rader v. Don J. Cummings Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API