Legal Opinion
Lexmark International, Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 11, 2013No. 1:10-cv-564PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Lexmark International, Inc.’s Renewed Motion and Memorandum in Support for Permission to Serve the Foreign Defendants Through Alternative Means Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3). (Doc. 377). In the motion, Plaintiff seeks permission to serve the following four Defendants by alternative means: (a) Eco Service China Ltd. located in China; (b) Shanghai Orink InfoTeeh International Co., Ltd. located in China; (c) Zhuhai Richeng Development Co., Ltd. located in China; and (d)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Madu, Edozie & Madu, P.C. v. Socketworks Ltd. NigeriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Gurung v. MalhotraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Popular Enterprises, LLC v. Webcom Media Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
3Cited by18 opinions
- Aerodyn Engineering, LLC v. Fidia CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- American Contractors Indemnity Company v. Linkology, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Billi Jo Woods v. Morris Mohawk Gaming Group, et al.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025
- DDLI Logistics LLC v. Metalsa SA de CVDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Heather Wanke v. Invasix Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.