Legal Opinion
Heather Wanke v. Invasix Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided May 19, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00692Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION HEATHER WANKE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:19-cv-0692 ) Judge Aleta A. Trauger INVASIX INC. and INMODE LTD., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM Invasix Inc. (“Invasix”) has filed a Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 67), to which Heather Wanke has filed a Response (Docket No. 74), and Invasix has filed a Reply (Docket No. 83). InMode Ltd. (“InMode”) has filed a separate Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 69), to which Wanke has filed a Response (Docket No. 75), and InMode has filed a Reply (Docket No. 84). Wanke filed a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Cataldo v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.