Skelly Oil Company v. Waters
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentBerry, Justice
I am unable to agree with the majority opinion on the issue of whether claimant was engaged in hazardous employment at the time the accidental injury was sustained.
I agree with the majority’s statement that “Skelly’s business at this location was the sale of petroleum products and accessories to the public, and to sell certain services, *325such as greasing, washing, adjusting brakes and points, and fixing flats.” I am, however, unable to agree with the statement that follows to the effect that “In none of these operations were power machinery used, only simple hand tools.” A hydraulic hoist is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson Co., Inc. v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Harbour-Longmire-Pace Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Southland Refining Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Folsom Auto Supply v. BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Bishop v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.