Sochanski, Stanley J. v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. John F. Solomon, Jr., Palmer Tire Company, Geneva Metal Wheels Co
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Stanley Sochanski brought suit in the federal district court under diversity jurisdiction alleging that he had been injured while repairing a defective tire of a garden cart sold by Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears). A jury awarded damages to Sochanski but the district court granted a motion for judgment n.o.v. stating that Sochanski had not met the burden of proof which Pennsylvania law required to prove that the tire was defective. We disagree and will reverse so that judgment may be entered for the plaintiff.
I
Sochanski was injured…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cassisi v. Maytag Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Stanton v. Astra Pharmaceutical ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Roskop Dairy v. GEA Farm Tech.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Sochanski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Ducko v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.