Legal Opinion
Merrimac Corp. v. Sved
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 8, 1991No. 91 Civ. 1923 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Appellee Merrimac Corp. (“Merrimac”) has moved to dismiss this bankruptcy appeal as premature. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
The Parties
The primary debtor in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding is Marróse Corporation (“Marróse”). Merrimac, a Massachusetts Corporation, is an affiliate of Mar-rose. Merrimac filed for bankruptcy along with Marróse on August 25, 1989.
Appellant Thomas Sved (“Sved”) is a Canadian citizen and resident. Appellants Wilcros Enterprises Inc. (“Wilcros”) and Svedco Properties, Inc. (“Svedco”) are Canadian Corporations.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- W. T. Grant Company v. Mark S. Haines, and John A. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Cinerama, Inc., a New York Corporation v. Sweet Music, S.A., a Swiss Corporation, and Union Bank of Switzerland, a Swiss CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,572 in Re Anthony R. Martin-Trigona, Debtor. Antonio Schlehan v. Olympic Worldwide Communications, Inc., Richard Belford, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- H & S Plumbing Supplies, Inc., and Bahia Mahmet Bin Chambi v. Bancamerica Commercial Corp., the State of New York, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Citibank, N.A. v. Bombshell Taxi LLC (In re Hypnotic Taxi LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2016