Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nature's 10 Jewelers v. Gunderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2002No. NonePublished

1DissentKonenkamp, Justice

A

[¶ 17.] Few rules are more settled than the one that requires appellate judges to limit themselves to reviewing issues the parties preserved below and raised on appeal. Here, the Court departs from that reliable process by raising its own challenge to the trial court’s decision. In doing so, the majority makes findings of fact and considers a question not broached in the trial court and not brought to us for decision.3 Moreover, to reverse the trial *808court in this case, the majority raises an affirmative defense on plaintiffs’ behalf. A claim that a contract is void or voidable is an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
  5. Interocean Shipping Company v. National Shipping and Trading Corporation and Hellenic International Shipping, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API