Legal Opinion

Honis v. Coxe Bros. Co., Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1928No. Appeal 313PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

The husband of claimant was engaged in shoveling mud into mine cars. He met with a piece of rock, 17" long, 14" wide and about 8" thick. He removed the mud from the rock and took a pick to pull the rock out. It was hard work; he struck the r'o’ck with a pick in an endeavor to split it and in response to a question asked by a fellow workman as to whether he wanted a hammer, answered yes and as the hammer was brought, he dropped over dead.

The referee, the compensation board and the court below all decided that the widow of the deceased was entitled to compensation. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Calderwood v. Consolidated Lumber & Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Rushonosky v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Gibb v. New Field By-Products Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Royko v. Logan Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. McFadden v. Lehigh Navigation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Foster v. State College BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. McCoy v. SpriggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Diriscavage v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API