Legal Opinion

People v. Begnaud

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1991No. E009064PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

—This case is before us a second time because of alleged errors in the court’s resentencing of defendant. We affirm.

Facts

In the first appeal, in an unpublished opinion, this court affirmed the defendant’s conviction for commercial burglary but reversed his conviction for assault on a police officer because of ineffective assistance of counsel.

On January 18, 1991, the People dismissed the assault charge and defendant was sentenced on the commercial burglary. The trial court imposed an aggravated term of three years for this count along with a one-year…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. SerratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. NilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. AlfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API