Legal Opinion

Mikel v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided June 21, 2005No. 14-04-00489-CRPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant, Nakeithia Mikel, of possession of a controlled substance. After the trial court found two enhancement paragraphs true, it assessed punishment at twenty six-years’ imprisonment. In three issues, appellant contends (1) the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress, and (2) the evidence is insufficient to prove the enhancement paragraphs were true. We affirm appellant’s conviction, but remand for a new punishment hearing.

I.Background

On November 10, 2003, Deputy Marcus Staudt of the Harris County Sheriffs Department…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Moraguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RichCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Roberson, Crystal YvetteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Lugo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. Hopkins, Essie D.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Jamie Lee Bledsoe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API