Legal Opinion
Whitney Estate Co. v. Northern Assurance Co. of London
California Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1909No. S.F. No. 4970PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is an action on a policy of fire insurance. The facts are undisputed, such of them as were put in issue by the pleadings having been found by the court upon the agreement of the parties.
The defendant, in June, 1905, issued to plaintiff a policy-containing the following provisions bearing upon the question in dispute:
“Northern Assurance Company of London,
“In consideration of the stipulations herein named and of sixty-six 20-100 dollars premium does insure the Whitney Estate Company for the term of one year from the 1st day of June, 1905, at noon, to the 1st day of June, 1906, at noon,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Holt Manufacturing Co. v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Lite v. Firemen's InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Barry v. Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. NeislerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Jamison v. Utah Home Fire Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
- Finer Amusements, Inc. v. Citizens Insurance Company of New Jersey, and Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Unton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Ventura Kester, LLC v. Folksamerica Reinsurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.