Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Richardson
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Colorado; Robert E. Rewis, Judge. Action by John H. Richardson against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
Richardson sued the Railroad Company for the purpose of recovering damages for personal injuries which he received on March 11, 1906. He recovered a judgment, and the Railroad Company has brought the case here on writ of error. The facts upon which the liability of the company depends are as follows:
On March 11, 1906, the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway. Company was operating a line of road extending from Denver, Colo., to Akron, in said state. Among the. trains which said company operated upon said line of road was a train known as No. 14, which left Denver daily…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. HarcrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Sears v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Harrell v. Atlas Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Taylor v. Munson S. S. LineDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1913