Legal Opinion
Ernest Cadet v. State of Florida Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 31, 2014No. 12-14518PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Chief Judge:
The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act imposes a one-year statute of limitations period for filing a federal habe-as petition challenging a state court judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). The limitations period is subject to equitable tolling. *475Holland, v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 130 S.Ct. 2549, 2560, 177 L.Ed.2d 130 (2010). Defining the circumstances that justify equitable tolling of that limitations period is a work in progress, the latest work on it having been done in two Supreme Court decisions. See Maples v. Thomas, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 912, 181 L.Ed.2d 807…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Percy Stanley Harris v. Ronald Hutchinson, Warden, Maryland House of Corrections J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Maples v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Benito Luna v. Scott KernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Ernest Cadet v. State of Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Bob Jay Cole v. Warden, Georgia State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Daniel Lugo v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Floyd Damren v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.