Legal Opinion

Quisenberry v. Rulison

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1954No. Civ. 15979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

This is an appeal from an order made after final judgment denying the motion of appellant’s attorneys for counsel fees to be paid out of the portion of the judgment awarded to the compensation carrier of appellant’s employer pursuant to Labor Code, section 3856.

Plaintiff-appellant Quisenberry while in the course of his employment by Yellow Cab Company was injured by an automobile driven by defendant Rulison. On February 6, 1953, a verdict of $10,000 was awarded him for personal injuries against Rulison. Against this judgment respondent Pacific Indemnity Company had a lien of $2,690.31 for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burum v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. TrappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Tucker v. NasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. Raisola v. Flower Street Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Bosch v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API