Raisola v. Flower Street Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal from a postjudgment order denying attorney’s fees relating to a worker’s compensation lien. We reverse with directions.
Facts
Pursuant to a written contingent fee agreement, plaintiff Olivia Raisola retained the Law Offices of Greenberg & Panish to represent her with regard to a slip and fall accident. In the subsequently filed complaint it was alleged that defendant Flower Street Limited (defendant Flower) negligently controlled and maintained premises upon which plaintiff fell. Nine other defendants, not parties to this appeal, were also named.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Mabee v. Nurseryland Garden Centers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Walsh v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Hone v. Climatrol Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crampton v. TakegoshiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Gapusan v. JayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Dameshghi v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Engle v. EndlichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Nguyen v. LOS ANGELES CTY. HARBOR/UCLA MED. CTR.California Court of Appeal · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.