Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Celanese Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 28, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
27 N.J. Super. 219 (1953)
98 A.2d 715
HAROLD HENDERSON, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
CELANESE CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Law Division.
Decided July 28, 1953.
Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman (Mr. Mortimer Wald, of counsel), attorneys for petitioner-appellee.
Messrs. Kalisch & Kalisch (Mr. Isidor Kalisch, of counsel), attorneys for respondent-appellant.
NAUGHRIGHT, J.C.C.
Petitioner Harold Henderson was awarded compensation by the Division of Workmen's Compensation, Department of Labor and Industry, for disability he incurred as a result…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Spindler v. Universal Chain Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Reynolds v. Passaic Valley Sewerage CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Reynolds v. Passaic Valley Sewerage CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henderson v. Celanese Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Stasel v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Stasel v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955