Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stasel v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 29, 1955Published

1Dissent

*725SIMS,,, Judge,

(dissenting)..To- my mind the majority opinion is unsound and the. question is of sufficient importance .to justify a dissenting opinion.

The sole question involved is whether or not appellant’s injuries resulted from an accident which arose out of or was connected with his employment: The majority correctly say that for an injury to arise' out of the employment there must be a causal connection between the injury and the employment. This is but another way of saying the-injury must .have been connected with the-employment-and have flowed from that source and not.have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Andrews v. L. & S. Amusement Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Salmon v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  3. Henderson v. Celanese Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API