Legal Opinion
Moore v. Continental Casualty Company
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 10, 1973No. Civ. 71-741PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
The issue between the above parties covered by this Memorandum Opinion has to do with the effect of a portion of Paragraph 15 of the Subcontract Agreement entered into on October 13, 1969 between the Plaintiff as Subcontractor and Defendant-Intervenor Marilyn Apartments, Inc., (Marilyn) as Contractor. The parties have submitted this issue to the Court for decision on Stipulations Of Fact and Briefs, no additional evidence being desired for presentation to the Court by any party.
Plaintiff was the electrical subcontractor under Marilyn for an apartment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Thos. J. Dyer Company v. Bishop International Engineering Company and General Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- North American Graphite Corp. v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Mignot v. ParkhillOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Kasishke v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Southern Surety Co. v. MacMillan Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peacock Const. Co., Inc. v. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- MidAmerica Construction Management, Inc. v. MasTec North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Schuler-Haas Electric Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Norton v. HerronAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Sturdy Concrete Corp. v. NAB Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.