Legal Opinion

Webber v. City of Scottsbluff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1951No. 33036PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWenke, J.

This is an appeal by Jack Webber and Mamie Webber from an order of the district court for Scotts Bluff County overruling their motion. The purpose of the motion was to have the district court for Scotts Bluff County enter an order finding that the city of Scottsbluff had obtained no interest in their lands by reason of the proceedings taken under its ordinance No. 739.

This appeal arises out of the same condemnation proceedings as were involved in Webber v. City of Scottsbluff, 150 Neb. 446, 35 N. W. 2d 110, being case No. 32440. It will be herein referred to by that number. Therein we…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Missouri Ex Rel. Hurwitz v. NorthSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. May v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State ex rel. Nelson v. ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1945

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District v. ArmstrongNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Spire v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 1 v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Watkins v. DodsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Higgins v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API