Legal Opinion

Rodia v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1923No. 17603Published

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The respondent owns and operates a market garden in the city of Seattle, and sues the city for damages for loss of crops -on a portion of his garden, occasioned by negligent flooding through the breaking of a water main. The action resulted in a verdict of the jury in the sum of $900, and the appeal from the judgment based on that verdict presents but one question, namely; whether the proper proof of measure of damages has been made.

It is conceded, and, in fact, the record would justify no other position being taken, that the city is liable; but it is argued that the testimony of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shotwell v. DodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Fuhrman v. Interior Warehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Berg v. Yakima Valley Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Brace v. PedersonWashington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API