Legal Opinion

Cicero & Proviso St. Ry. Co. v. Brown

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 31, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jbsse Holdom, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

For appellant, it is claimed that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the pleas of the statute of limitations; in failing to give to the jury instruction Ho. 17 requested by appellant and marked “ Given;” in giving appellee’s third instruction; andin refusing numerous instructions requested by appellant; and that the verdict was so excessive as to show such passion and prejudice on the part of the jury as to vitiate the verdict.

For the purpose of considering the question raised as to the statute of limitations, we need only consider the original declaration and the two additional…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. MaddenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Eylenfeldt v. Illinois Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. GillisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. McMeenIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hirsch v. Chicago Consolidated Traction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. StoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  4. Muren Coal & Ice Co. v. HowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API