Legal Opinion
Bayer AG v. Sony Electronics, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 4, 2002No. CIV.A.95-8-JJF. No. CIV.A.97-401-JJFPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
This action was brought by Plaintiff, Bayer AG (“Bayer”), against Defendants, Sony Electronics Inc. (“SEL”), Sony Corporation, Inc. (“Sony”) and Dowa Mining Co. (“Dowa”) (collectively “the Sony Defendants”), for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,290,799 (the “ ’799 Patent”). The ’799 Patent issued to Bayer on September 22, 1981 and expired on February 25, 2000. The ’799 Patent describes and claims a magnetic metal powder suitable for use in magnetic recording media such as in audio and video tapes. Bayer contends that SEL infringed the ’799 Patent by…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adidas-America, Inc. v. Payless Shoesource, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2008
- Hoffman v. Town of SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Adidas America, Inc. v. Payless Shoesource, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2007
- Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- BBF Partners LLC v. Mon Ethos Pro Consulting LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.