Legal Opinion
Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet Company
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 21, 2011No. Civ. 06-091-SLRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Callaway Golf Company (“plaintiff’) brought suit against defendant Acushnet Company (“defendant”), alleging that Acushnet has infringed various claims of four golf ball patents owned by plaintiff (known as the “Sullivan patents”): U.S. Patent Nos. 6,210,293 (“the '293 patent”), 6,503,156 (“the ’156 patent”), 6,506,130 (“the '130 patent”), and 6,595,873 (“the '873 patent”). At the conclusion of the claim construction exercise, defendant stipulated that its golf balls infringed but maintained that the asserted claims…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015