Legal Opinion

In re M.C. Opinion text corrected Apr. 5, 2001

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 28, 2001No. 1-99-0703 RelPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

There are two issues to decide in this case. First, whether the new transfer provision of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 applies to this case. See 705 ILCS 405/5 — 805 (West Supp. 1999) (added by the Juvenile Justice Reform Provisions of 1998 (Pub. Act 90 — 590, eff. January 1, 1999)). The trial court held it did not. Second, whether the trial court erred when it denied the State’s motion to transfer the minor respondent (M.C.) to the criminal division. We reverse and remand.

On August 13, 1998, the State filed a petition for adjudication of wardship charging M.C. was delinquent because he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. People v. FranklinIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. First of America Trust Co. v. ArmsteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. P.H.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. CervantesIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. Matthew M.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. People v. OrtizAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  3. People v. PereaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. People v. PattersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API