Legal Opinion

State v. Burris

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 20, 1976No. C-75-10-3536, CA 6082PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a stolen motor vehicle. ORS 481.990(5).

The state urges that we dismiss defendant’s appeal for failure to comply with this court’s Rules of Procedure. Defendant’s brief fails to comply with the following rules:

Rule 6.15, which requires a list of authorities referred to in the brief;

Rule 6.17, which requires that the statement of facts contain references to where in the record such facts appear;

Rule 6.18, which requires that each assignment of error set out verbatim the pertinent portions of the record;

Rule 6.22, which requires that reference…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. LamphereOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. State v. HydeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. BuschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API