Legal Opinion

March Fong Eu v. Chacon

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1976No. S.F. 23420PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This case presents the narrow question whether incumbent justice court judges who were not attorneys when they became judges (hereafter called “nonattomey judges”) are eligible to run for reelectión at the June 8, 1976, primary election. We have concluded that, by reason of section 71701 of the Government Code, such nonattomey judges are ineligible to run for the office in question.

We trace certain chronology pertinent to the case. On February, 6, 1976, real parties in interest filed a mandate action in the Santa Barbara Superior Court, alleging that they are incumbent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Gordon v. Justice CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Stockton Savings & Loan Bank v. MassanetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Johnson v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Raven's Cove Townhomes, Inc. v. Knuppe Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API