Legal Opinion
(PC) Gaskins v. Mule Creek State Prison
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 19, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00459Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH GASKINS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00459-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS 13 v. ACTION 14 MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED 15 Defendant. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED 16 ECF No. 20 17 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 18 19 20 21 As in his prior two complaints, plaintiff alleges that he was transferred between prisons 22 without his personal property. ECF No. 20 at 3. As explained in my prior screening…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lee Max Barnett v. Helen Centoni, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison S. Donahue, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.