Legal Opinion
Simpkins v. Shalala
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 1998No. Civ.A.95-1095 (RCL)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and the plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment.
Summary judgment is appropriate when there is “no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). This case is proper for summary judgment as it does not present any disputed issues of material fact. For the reasons set forth below the court grants the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in part and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vanover v. HantmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Wheeler v. Methodist Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Doe v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Doe v. Rodgers, M.H.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.