Legal Opinion

State v. Fienberg

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 4, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The accused moved in the trial court that the verdict should be set aside on the ground that it was contrary to the evidence, and to the weight of the evidence. This motion was denied, and its denial is a ground of appeal.

The entire evidence in the cases as tried is made a part of the record. A review of the evidence discloses that the jury could reasonably have found the following facts: Fienberg and Casper came to Bridgeport from New York and rented a part of an old two-story frame building, consisting of a ground floor store and a second floor, which formerly had been the sleeping rooms of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. People v. . O'NeillNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  2. State v. DensonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. State v. GradySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  4. State v. LucasConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
  5. State v. LucasConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API