Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Worden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Newaygo. Foreclosure. Defendant Babcock appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

October 30th, 1872, complainant owned in fee and free from encumbrance a hotel property in the village of Newaygo and twenty acres of land near there. At the same time the defendant Worden owned a farm near the village of Lowell. On that day they agreed upon an exchange. Complainant’s property was valued at $9000, and Worden’s farm was estimated at $10,000. But the farm was encumbered, and Worden’s interest was an equity of redemption and nothing more. Certain former owners had mortgaged it January 1, 1857, to David Dows of New York for $5000, with semi-annual interest at seven per cent, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Dye v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Thurston v. PrentissMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Hunter v. New York & Saginaw Solar Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Turner v. McCartyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Central National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Central Jersey Dodge Truck Center, Inc. v. Sightseer Corporation and Prf Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  3. Moulton v. Lobdell-Emery Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Patterson v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. First State Bank of Paradise v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API