Legal Opinion

Miller v. Spicer

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 7, 1993No. Civ. A. 90-586 MMSPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants Robert Spicer, M.D., and Beebe Medical Center [“Beebe”] move for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as to three of the claims asserted in plaintiff Rod Miller’s complaint. For the reasons which follow, summary judgment on the issue of liability will be granted in favor of Dr. Spicer on plaintiffs claim defendants discriminated against him on the basis of his perceived human immunodeficiency virus [“HIV”] status in violation 29 U.S.C. § 794 (1988). Defendant Beebe’s motion for summary judgment on this…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Warriner v. StantonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Ferguson v. City of PhoenixDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1996
  3. Sharrow v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Woolfolk v. DuncanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Atakpa v. Perimeter Ob-Gyn Associates, P.C.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API