Legal Opinion

Community National Bank of Pontiac v. Gidney

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 10, 1961No. Civ. 19383PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREEMAN, District Judge.

This motion for production of documents arises out of an action by the plaintiff, Community National Bank of Pontiac, v. the United States Comptroller of the Currency (hereinafter referred to as the “Comptroller”) and the defendant bank, Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit.

The essential allegations in the complaint are that the Comptroller, on or about August 3, 1959, approved an application by the defendant bank for permission to establish a branch bank in Bioomfield Township, Oakland County, Michigan; that such approval was unauthorized by law and not in accord…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Heikkila v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Traverse City State Bank v. Empire National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1964
  2. Sugarman v. ForbragdDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1967
  3. Warren Bank v. SaxonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
  4. Jackson v. First National Bank of ValdostaDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1965
  5. Olsen v. CampDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API