Legal Opinion

Walker v. District Grand Lodge No. 18

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1915No. 6164PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari; from Muscogee superior court—Judge Cox presiding. November 16, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

1. A plea in abatement is necessarily a proceeding in the cause to which it appertains,^-a mere part and parcel of the action considered as a whole,—and not a proceeding separate and distinct from the main action. It is a defense interposed to stop the plaintiff’s *645action, but it is essentially a proceeding in the main cause. A plea in abatement can not be maintained where there is a purported entry of service and yet the defendant insists that he was never in fact served, unless there is a traverse of the return of service (Citizens Bank v. Fort, ante, 427) ; consequently, the determination…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Athearn v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. DeVane v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Boatright v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Ragsdale v. MiddlebrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API