Scott v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
Eule 24, Exhibit “2-B,” Eeport No. 2, General Procedure in Trial Courts, provides as follows: “Nothing in this section of these rules shall repeal or affect the mode of any special statutory proceeding, such as the foreclosure of liens and mortgages, proceedings to eject tenants and intruders, claims and illegalities, mandamus, quo warranto, prohibition, habeas corpus, establishment of lost papers, petitions to the judge of the superior court at chambers, nor other special .proceedings of like nature, nor the fictitious forms ..of pleading in ejectments,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McElhannon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Franke v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Butts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Culbreth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bragg v. BraggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Washburn v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Fields v. AlbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Carter v. Georgia Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967