Legal Opinion

Ragsdale v. Middlebrooks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1934No. 23996Published

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Upon the hearing of the certiorari in this case, the defendant in certiorari filed a traverse to the answer of the trial magistrate. The issue thus raised was submitted to a jury and a verdict in favor of the traverse was returned. Subsequently the plaintiff in certiorari made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and the movant brought the case to this court, assigning that judgment as error.

*9The judgment excepted to is not a final judgment within the meaning of the provisions of section 6138 of the Civil Code of 1910. “The determination of the merits of the traverse is a mere…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. EstesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Roe ex. dem. Herrin v. GrannisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  3. Walker v. District Grand Lodge No. 18Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API